
Stopping a parent moving a child is one of the most urgent and emotionally charged challenges we handle at A L Law. One day you are coordinating the Tuesday school run, and the next, you receive a text message saying your ex-partner is planning to move three counties away—or even three time zones away. If you haven’t given your consent for such a life-altering change, you are likely looking for immediate legal solutions to keep your child’s life stable.
When it comes to stopping a parent moving a child, the most effective tool in the English legal system is the Prohibited Steps Order (PSO). Whether the planned move is to a different city or across international borders, this order acts as a “legal handbrake,” preventing a parent from relocating without your written agreement or the court’s permission.
The law treats a move to Manchester differently than a move to Madrid, but both require a similar level of scrutiny if the move disrupts the existing [“Child arrangement orders or impacts your ability to exercise parental responsibility.
Many parents believe they have an absolute right to move anywhere within the UK. However, if a move from London to Newcastle would effectively end a child’s relationship with their other parent, the court can intervene. Stopping a parent moving a child internally is possible if you can prove the move is not in the child’s best interests.
Moving a child permanently outside the UK is a “binary” decision: the court either allows it or it doesn’t. You cannot legally take a child out of the country for more than 28 days without the consent of everyone with PR. Doing so without permission is classified as child abduction.
A PSO is an injunction granted under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989. It specifically prohibits a parent from “taking a step” that is usually within their parental rights—in this case, moving the child’s habitual residence.
If you are currently in the process of stopping a parent moving a child, you might also need a Specific Issue Order. While the PSO stops the move, a Specific Issue Order is used by the relocating parent to ask for permission. Often, these two applications are heard by the court at the same time.
When a Judge is faced with a case involving stopping a parent moving a child, they don’t look at “parental rights.” They look at the “Welfare Checklist.” The court will often involve CAFCASS to help determine:
In 2026, case law (such as the principles in Re C) has shifted away from favoring the “primary carer.” The court now conducts a holistic, “side-by-side” analysis of both parents’ proposals. This modern approach has made stopping a parent moving a child more achievable if the relocation plan is poorly thought out.
If you fear your child is being taken abroad imminently, you cannot wait for a mediation session or a standard court hearing. In these high-stakes scenarios, we can apply for an “Ex-Parte” order.
As we discussed in our guide, Prohibited Steps Order UK: How to Stop a Parent from Making Risky Decisions, an emergency order can be granted on the same day without the other parent being present. This is a vital step in stopping a parent moving a child before they reach the airport or the ferry terminal.
At A L Law, we specialise in the “binary” world of relocation. We represent both parents who have a genuine need to move and those who are fighting to keep their children close. We understand that these cases aren’t just about geography; they are about the fundamental structure of your child’s future.
Whether you need a PSO for internal relocation or are facing an international “Leave to Remove” battle, our team provides the fact-driven, robust representation you need. We can’t help you pack (or unpack) the boxes, but we can make sure the law is on your side.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. For tailored support, please contact the specialist team at A L Law.